Consultation on Mission Language and Metaphors
Dear AD2-Announce Reader:
Please see the below Consultation Statement coming forth from the
recent "Consultation on Mission Language and Metaphors" held at Fuller
Seminary, 1 - 3 June 2000.
Let me encourage you to closely review this statement! As indicated
therein, this is not a new issue - but the nature of our new
technology, instantly releasing formal and informal communications
around the world to an ever widening / deepening audience, calls for
new reflection and an updated assessment of the language / metaphors
used in mission communication releases. Thank you for your review,
reflection and prayers!
That all may hear - soon!
Luis Bush
International Director
AD2000 & Beyond Movement
CONSULTATION ON MISSION LANGUAGE AND METAPHORS
SCHOOL OF WORLD MISSION
FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
JUNE 1-3, 2000
STATEMENT:
We, the participants in the consultation, have gathered to think and
pray together about the words, metaphors and images evangelicals use
to communicate about the missionary mandate and endeavorAs a relatively small group of mission agency and church leaders,
theologians and communicators, we comprise neither a comprehensive nor
adequately representative cross-section of the evangelical spectrum.
We do, however, comprise a group unified in our concern that unwise
language choices not be a hindrance to persons truly hearing the
Gospel of Christ. We hope and pray that our tentative beginning here
will encourage others in our context and around the world to grapple
with some of the issues we have considered.
We regret that certain words and images long employed to call the
church to mission have increasingly caused offense to the very people
with whom we are seeking to share the Good News. Some of these words
and images are biblical; some are motivational tools from the secular
arena that we use to inspire involvement and action. Many are
military in nature: "target," "conquer," "army," "crusade,"
"mobilize," "beachhead," "advance," "enemy," "battle."
We may know what such terms mean to us, but what do they mean to
others? Are we unintentionally making those we most want to befriend
feel we regard them as enemies, while helping opponents of Christian
mission to make their case against us? Can we find more reconciling,
redemptive words and images in Scripture and elsewhere that will aid
us in expressing love, respect and effective witness for Christ,
rather than creating an atmosphere of adversarial confrontation?
First, we agree about several basic principles:
- We are not ashamed of the Gospel, which is salvation to those who
believe. We seek to preach it, teach it, and demonstrate it through
acts of love and mercy among all peoples in obedience to our Lord1s
command until He returns.
- We realize that the Gospel itself is an offense and a stumbling
block to those who reject it. We also understand that the mission of
Christ will be opposed in many places and by all meansWe affirm that the Kingdom of God has triumphed over all the
kingdoms and powers of this world at the cross. Nevertheless there is
indeed a battle under way between the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom
of Satan. In this spiritual battle we are privileged to partner with
God in revealing Himself and setting the captives free.
While acknowledging these truths, we recognize the need to deal with
several critical realities:
- Metaphors and the mindsets and attitudes behind them are potent in
shaping thought and compelling action. Positive metaphors are
essential tools of missions and evangelism. When twisted or taken too
far, however, they distort God1s purposes. "Warfare" metaphors and
terminology, while biblical in the cosmic/spiritual sense, have been
misused in Christian mission communications. They have become
increasingly counterproductive to mission work, sometimes endangering
the lives of local believers, and are being used by opponents of the
church to indict and impede its work. We therefore advocate an
immediate end to the inappropriate use of such words.
Yes, we are called to the discipline and single-mindedness of soldiers
at war (2 Tim. 2:3-4). However, "our struggle is not against flesh and
blood" but against the unseen rulers of spiritual darkness (Eph.
6:12). Jesus Christ fulfills God1s age-old message of love,
forgiveness, reconciliation and blessing for the peoples according to
God1s promise to Abraham (Gen. 12:2,3). Jesus Himself is the great
master of redemptive metaphors (see His parables), and Scripture
offers rich treasure of words and images we can use to call God1s
people to mission. He proclaimed good news to the poor, release for
the prisoners, and sight for the blind (Lk. 4:18). We encourage
Christian mission agencies and local churches to re-examine Scripture
and restate their global task in terms consistent with the teaching
and mission of Christ. Alternate words and images include blessing,
healing, inviting, sowing and reaping, fishing, restoring family
relationships, becoming reconcilers, peacemakers and ambassadors.
- As a motivation for mission involvement, people are responding to
the call to glorify God among the nations and wherever He is not yet
being worshiped. They also respond to the call to follow Christ into
servanthood and sacrifice, the call to lift up the downtrodden, the
call to a life of great purpose and meaning in community with others
of like mind. These are themes around which we need to develop
metaphors to summon God1s people to God1s mission.
- The new dynamics of globalization and instant global electronic
information technologies are rapidly changing the context of our
communication. The technology that opens the world to us also opens
us -- and our words -- to the world. We can no longer maintain a dichotomy
between what we say to the "home folks" and what say to the world.
The world, we must assume, will read or hear whatever we say to our
own. Are we willing not to use language behind the back of
unbelievers concerning their culture and location that we would not
use face to face in sharing the message and love of Christ?
We encourage our evangelical friends, colleagues, churches and partner
agencies around the world to think and pray with us about these
things. We invite the reflection and wisdom of our brothers and
sisters into what we hope will become an ongoing dialogue about these
important issues, to the end that our light might shine brighter in
the world, and that our ministry of reconciliation for the sake of
God's great name might flourish.
End of STATEMENT
Consultation Contributors:
Mission and Church Leaders:
- Dwight Baker, World Christian Foundations
- Erich Bridges, International Mission Board SBC
- David Broucek, TEAM
- Luis Bush, AD2000 & Beyond Movement
- Patrick O. Cate, CHRISTAR
- Gary Corwin, SIM International
- Bob Fulton, Association of Vineyard Churches
- David Greenlee, Operation Mobilization
- David Hansen, International Ministries, Back to the Bible
- Richard Howell, Evangelical Fellowship of India
- Jon Lewis, Mission Aviation Fellowship
- Rick Love, Frontiers
- Rudolf Mak, OMF International
- John Mariner, World Witness, ARPC
- Paul McKaughan, Evangelical Fellowship of Mission Agencies
- John H. Orme, IFMA
- Stan Parks, Joshua Project 23
- Jerry Rankin, International Mission Board SBC
- D. John Richard, AD2000 & Beyond Movement
- David Samuel, EFI
- Bill Taylor, WEF Missions Commission
- Geoff Tunnicliffe, Task Force for Global Mission, Evangelical
Fellowship of Canada
- Larry Walker, Advancing Churches in Missions Commitment
- Ralph Winter, US Center for World Mission
Mission Theologians and Missiologists:
- David Hortano, New Life Community Church
- Sherwood Lingenfeldter, School of World Mission, Fuller Theological
Seminary
- Ken Mulholland, Columbia International University
- Paul Pierson, School of World Mission, Fuller Theological Seminary
- Wilbert Shenk, School of World Mission, Fuller Theological Seminary
New Testament Scholars:
- Clinton Arnold, Talbot School of Theology, Biola University
- Richard Beaton, School of Theology, Fuller Theological Seminary
Back to the AD2000 home page
Webmaster
6/25/00