Networking
APPENDIX B
RESULTS SUMMARY FROM WORLD BY 2000 SURVEY
|
Principles and philosophy |
|
|
1. Rank and relative importance of the following as to their contribution to the success of World by 2000. |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Clarity of Commitment Statement |
3.42 |
|
Executive Committee Leadership |
3.67 |
|
Steering Committee Leadership |
3.50 |
|
Research Office Leadership |
3.42 |
|
Executive Committee Meetings |
5.67 |
|
Steering Committee Meetings |
3.58 |
|
Other |
6.83 |
|
2. In your opinion, whose level of commitment to World by 2000 is most significant in the success of the World by 2000 network? |
|
|
Count |
|
|
President or CEO |
4 |
|
Headquarters Staff |
1 |
|
Field & Programming Staff |
2 |
|
All of above |
5 |
|
Other |
0 |
|
3. What impact has networking in World by 2000 had on your organization’s ministry strategy? |
|
|
Count |
|
|
Helped Focus Strategy |
12 |
|
No Appreciable Change |
2 |
|
Caused Tension |
3 |
|
Not Sure |
1 |
|
4. What value or significance does the World by 2000 commitment have on your headquarters staff? |
|
|
Count |
|
|
Very significant, motivational |
8 |
|
Not very significant |
4 |
|
Source of tension or frustration |
0 |
|
Not sure |
3 |
|
Principles and philosophy (continued) |
|
|
5. What value or significance does the World by 2000 commitment have on your international or field staff? |
|
|
Count |
|
|
Very significant, motivational |
8 |
|
Not very significant |
4 |
|
Source of tension or frustration |
2 |
|
Not sure |
2 |
|
6. What impact has the World by 2000 commitment had on your donor and public relations efforts? |
|
|
Count |
|
|
Helped, favorable |
11 |
|
Confused constituents |
0 |
|
Hurt relations |
0 |
|
Other |
0 |
|
Not sure |
2 |
|
Organizational and functional |
|
|
1. Rank the organizational or functional factors contributing to the success of World by 2000. |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Executive Committee Meetings |
3.75 |
|
Steering Committee Meetings |
1.33 |
|
Committee Communication |
3.75 |
|
Research Office |
1.92 |
|
Other |
6.00 |
|
2. Rank the relative importance of each aspect of the Committee Meetings. |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Fellowship |
2.42 |
|
Prayer |
2.42 |
|
Ministry Reports |
2.92 |
|
Ministry Coordination |
2.25 |
|
Other |
6.00 |
|
3. In your opinion, what is the optimum number of Executive Committee meetings per year? |
|
|
Count |
|
|
One |
0 |
|
One plus NRB |
8 |
|
Two |
1 |
|
Two plus NRB |
3 |
|
4. In your opinion, what is the optimum number of Steering Committee meetings per year? |
|
|
Count |
|
|
One |
0 |
|
Two |
8 |
|
Other |
4 |
|
Organizational and functional (continued) |
|
|
5. Rank the relative value of various means of communication used? |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
1.83 |
|
FAX |
5.58 |
|
Internet Web Pages |
5.17 |
|
Meetings |
1.92 |
|
Printed Mailed Reports |
4.25 |
|
Telephone Conversations |
4.67 |
|
Partnership verses Networking |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Comfort |
|
|
Joint projects of training |
4.18 |
|
Follow-up |
5.18 |
|
Program production |
4.91 |
|
Transmission facilities |
4.00 |
|
Public relations efforts |
5.27 |
|
Strategic plans |
2.45 |
|
Language ministry strategy |
2.36 |
|
Other |
8.64 |
|
Effectiveness |
|
|
Joint projects of training |
4.91 |
|
Follow-up |
6.00 |
|
Program production |
4.82 |
|
Transmission facilities |
3.91 |
|
Public relations efforts |
5.27 |
|
Strategic plans |
1.82 |
|
Language ministry strategy |
2.00 |
|
Other |
8.55 |
|
Commitment |
|
|
Joint projects of training |
4.18 |
|
Follow-up |
6.27 |
|
Program production |
4.73 |
|
Transmission facilities |
3.55 |
|
Public relations efforts |
4.64 |
|
Strategic plans |
2.45 |
|
Language ministry strategy |
3.27 |
|
Other |
7.55 |
|
Office functions |
|
|
1. Rank the importance of various functions of the World by 2000 Research Office |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Central coordination point |
1.25 |
|
Facilitate communication |
2.83 |
|
Reports on ministry progress |
3.58 |
|
Praise and prayer items |
3.50 |
|
Conference representation |
3.83 |
|
Other |
7.00 |
|
2 . In your opinion, how could the Research Office help improve the success of the World by 2000 ministry network? |
|
|
Count |
|
|
Function as is |
8 |
|
Follow-up Committee Meetings |
8 |
|
Higher public profile |
4 |
|
Other |
0 |
|
Other remarks |
|
|
1. What factors might be strengthened to improve the success of the World by 2000 ministry network? |
|
|
Count |
|
|
Principles and philosophy |
4 |
|
Committee level leadership |
7 |
|
Meetings |
4 |
|
Communication |
4 |
|
Office functions |
1 |
|
Sharing strategic plans |
9 |
|
Other |
0 |
Document - A Model for Ministry Networking
Appendix A - World By 2000 Survey Form.
|
AGP: Introduction | Adoption | Cooperation | Individual Involvement | Resources |
WebMaster
1/21/99